HVO demonstration project provides blue print for fair and affordable heat decarbonisation in UK and Ireland
After three successful heating seasons, a full report on work designed to demonstrate the viability of HVO in heating has been published. This UK project, which was funded entirely by industry, focussed on the real-world use of HVO, so existing heating systems were utilised in the 126 participating homes and nine non-domestic buildings.
The main goal of the project was to test the deployment of HVO in as wide a range of typical situations as possible. This meant selecting sites right across Britain and ensuring that a broad cross-section of appliance types was included. The test sites included both condensing and non-condensing boilers, combi boilers, system appliances and cookers.
Appliance output was typical of the types commonly used in the UK, with 38 between 10 - 20kW, 63 between 20 - 30kW and 22 between 30 - 40kW. The conversions typically involved the following steps:
- Emptying and cleansing the fuel storage tanks.
- Replacing fuel carrying components if not HVO compatible. For example, fuel filter, deaerator, fuel pump, etc.
- Fitting a new HVO calibrated burner nozzle.
- Calculating new combustion settings to achieve the required heat output.
- Appliance commissioning.
- Labelling of equipment to declare it had been converted to operate on HVO
The conversion process took just over an hour and in future could be completed as part of a routine service by a technician.
All the appliances used in the project successfully operated on HVO with no reports of diminished combustion performance. Comparing measured boiler efficiency pre and post conversion to HVO, the aggregate differential ranged from negative 1.1% to positive 4.7% when compared to measurements obtained when the same appliance was fired on kerosene.
To demonstrate the full potential of HVO as a low carbon solution, 100% HVO was used throughout the project, resulting in a typical carbon reduction of 88% compared to kerosene, the fuel typically used in UK and Republic of Ireland oil heating appliances. Not surprisingly, the homeowners involved in the project were extremely positive about it, relishing the way their emissions had been reduced with so little fuss. From a policy perspective, this highlights that for households and businesses with existing oil heating systems, HVO provides an attractive, consumer-friendly pathway to very significant carbon reductions by minimising capital cost and disruption – two of the challenges most likely to hinder the deployment of the UK and Irish government’s preferred low carbon technology, air source heat pumps, in rural off-gas grid homes.
This point was made most powerfully in the Cornish village of Kehelland, where 17 homes were converted during the trial. Detailed comparisons were made between the cost of HVO conversion and an air source heat pump, utilising an online installation calculator tool published by the UK government. While the cost of HVO conversion was just a few hundred pounds (£), the average cost of fitting a heat pump and carrying out the retrofit work recommended by the government’s calculator tool was £23,940.
Of course, running costs are a different story because HVO is currently a more expensive fuel than kerosene although, with the cost of electricity high in the UK, the difference compared to the heat pump options modelled was less than might have been expected. Indeed, in the highest electricity cost modelled, HVO came out ahead. However, the low carbon options were all more expensive than the existing fossil fuel, which currently makes heat decarbonisation a difficult sell to consumers for politicians and policymakers.
To counter this, industry has proposed changes to regularise the tax on HVO used in heating and the implementation of a fuel obligation scheme that would make the running costs for HVO much closer to kerosene. This would enable policy makers to capitalise on this easy transition pathway to low carbon heating and ensure rural oil-heated households and businesses have the necessary technology choices they need.